Yes, only INFRA ppl have the privileges on Github to add anything to the repos.

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> We would need to raise an INFRA ticket for this, right ?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:53 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Add build status to github
>
> We require someone with github admin rights to login to both services using 
> github account and activate build for cordova-lib repo. The rest of the work 
> will be done by the services.
>
> Thx!
> Sergey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Koudritsky [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Add build status to github
>
> +1 for running both, Travis and AppVeyor.
>
> What's needed in terms of setting up the hooks on GitHub side? Do we need in 
> INFRA ticket for this?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) < 
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've sent separate PRs for Travis and AppVeyor build configurations:
>>         https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/59
>>         https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/60
>>
>> #1 Both Travis and AppVeyor use very similar .yml based configuration
>> files which are very easy to use/understand.
>>
>> #2 AppVeyor showed me Windows specific test failure related to paths
>> so I think we should tun tests on both Linux and Windows
>>         https://ci.appveyor.com/project/sgrebnov/cordova-lib/build/1.0.2
>>         1) lazy_load module custom method (loads custom cordova libs)
>> local paths for libraries should return the local path, no symlink
>>         862   Message:
>>         863     Expected '\some\random\lib' to equal '/some/random/lib'.
>>
>>     * PS. I have more failures on my local machine - will investigate
>> this
>>
>> #3 Travis build sample
>>         https://travis-ci.org/sgrebnov/cordova-lib/builds/30154663
>>
>> #4 Sample home page with both build badges integrated:
>> https://github.com/sgrebnov/cordova-lib/
>>
>> #5  Pull Requests. Tests are run on both services but github shows
>> information for the only one of them - message is changed as per
>> response from the build service, the last message is showed (not sure
>> how it works if we have failure + then success - to be investigated).
>>         https://github.com/sgrebnov/cordova-lib/pull/4
>>
>> Thx!
>> Sergey
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>> Of Brian LeRoux
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:42 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Add build status to github
>>
>> I see, it looks like our testing infra is going to be
>> redunant/distributed regardless. (travis + X) No sense in fighting it!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)
>> < [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Don't we still need Travis to drive the Saucelabs test?
>> >
>> > P.S: I have been investigating to see if I could use Appium to run
>> > Medic tests.  No Windows support yet though :(
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> > Behalf Of Brian LeRoux
>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:18 AM
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: RE: Add build status to github
>> >
>> > https://docs.saucelabs.com/reference/status-images/
>> > On Jul 15, 2014 9:17 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Or we could use SauceLabs (for all) On Jul 15, 2014 9:16 AM,
>> > > "Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)" < [email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> We would need both right? For covering Windows and Linux
>> > >> platforms for lib to build/run.
>> > >>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Mark Koudritsky [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:55 AM
>> > >> To: [email protected]
>> > >> Subject: Re: Add build status to github
>> > >>
>> > >> Ok, let's ask here.
>> > >>
>> > >> Does anybody have any strong preferences for either AppVeyor or
>> > >> TravisCI or both for cordova-lib?
>> > >> note, this is only about running "npm test" in cordova-lib.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to