Yes, only INFRA ppl have the privileges on Github to add anything to the repos.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) <panar...@microsoft.com> wrote: > We would need to raise an INFRA ticket for this, right ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-seg...@microsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:53 AM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: RE: Add build status to github > > We require someone with github admin rights to login to both services using > github account and activate build for cordova-lib repo. The rest of the work > will be done by the services. > > Thx! > Sergey > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Koudritsky [mailto:kam...@google.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:42 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: Add build status to github > > +1 for running both, Travis and AppVeyor. > > What's needed in terms of setting up the hooks on GitHub side? Do we need in > INFRA ticket for this? > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) < > v-seg...@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> I've sent separate PRs for Travis and AppVeyor build configurations: >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/59 >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/60 >> >> #1 Both Travis and AppVeyor use very similar .yml based configuration >> files which are very easy to use/understand. >> >> #2 AppVeyor showed me Windows specific test failure related to paths >> so I think we should tun tests on both Linux and Windows >> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/sgrebnov/cordova-lib/build/1.0.2 >> 1) lazy_load module custom method (loads custom cordova libs) >> local paths for libraries should return the local path, no symlink >> 862 Message: >> 863 Expected '\some\random\lib' to equal '/some/random/lib'. >> >> * PS. I have more failures on my local machine - will investigate >> this >> >> #3 Travis build sample >> https://travis-ci.org/sgrebnov/cordova-lib/builds/30154663 >> >> #4 Sample home page with both build badges integrated: >> https://github.com/sgrebnov/cordova-lib/ >> >> #5 Pull Requests. Tests are run on both services but github shows >> information for the only one of them - message is changed as per >> response from the build service, the last message is showed (not sure >> how it works if we have failure + then success - to be investigated). >> https://github.com/sgrebnov/cordova-lib/pull/4 >> >> Thx! >> Sergey >> -----Original Message----- >> From: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf >> Of Brian LeRoux >> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:42 PM >> To: dev@cordova.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Add build status to github >> >> I see, it looks like our testing infra is going to be >> redunant/distributed regardless. (travis + X) No sense in fighting it! >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) >> < panar...@microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> > Don't we still need Travis to drive the Saucelabs test? >> > >> > P.S: I have been investigating to see if I could use Appium to run >> > Medic tests. No Windows support yet though :( >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On >> > Behalf Of Brian LeRoux >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:18 AM >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org >> > Subject: RE: Add build status to github >> > >> > https://docs.saucelabs.com/reference/status-images/ >> > On Jul 15, 2014 9:17 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >> > > Or we could use SauceLabs (for all) On Jul 15, 2014 9:16 AM, >> > > "Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)" < panar...@microsoft.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> We would need both right? For covering Windows and Linux >> > >> platforms for lib to build/run. >> > >> >> > >> -----Original Message----- >> > >> From: Mark Koudritsky [mailto:kam...@google.com] >> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:55 AM >> > >> To: dev@cordova.apache.org >> > >> Subject: Re: Add build status to github >> > >> >> > >> Ok, let's ask here. >> > >> >> > >> Does anybody have any strong preferences for either AppVeyor or >> > >> TravisCI or both for cordova-lib? >> > >> note, this is only about running "npm test" in cordova-lib. >> > >> >> > > >> > >>
