We [Microsoft team] did additional round of switch names for windows discussion and propose to use '--win' and '--phone'. Please let me know if it works. I've sent the following PR for review https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/pull/39
Thx! Sergey -----Original Message----- From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014 3:31 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: platform switches for Windows Universal Apps The iOS format can be cleaned up (at least for the Simulator) -- but the parameters to ios-sim depend on the executable itself and we can't change that without breaking everyone, so we will have to map the params instead of passing it through. --target=iPhone5s will map to "--retina --64bit --family iphone" for example On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:48 AM, purplecabbage <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > People *must* be exposed to windows terminology. None of your --store > alternative make sense. > --windows-store might, or maybe --modern-app or --winrt ? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Aug 8, 2014, at 6:20 AM, Mark Koudritsky <kam...@google.com> wrote: >> >> My 2 cents: >> >> - I prefer "phone" over "handset" as I don't like those overly dry >> formal names that got heavily overloaded with years but still give a false >> sense of better specificity. >> - --store is a very counter intuitive name for desktop apps for someone >> not exposed to the new Windows terminology. Is it intended to mean desktop >> apps? (some alternatives --desktop, --laptop, --fullsize, --largescreen ?) >> - --phone vs --type=phone - either seems fine to me and pretty easy to >> implement. >> - --target=X is unrelated, it's not for selecting a type of device but >> for explicitly choosing the device to use if several are connected to your >> dev station.
