That looks better. Thanks! On Sep 4, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, I think it's all cleaned up now ... sorry for the mess. > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oops, I'll sort this mess out now. >> >> @purplecabbage >> risingj.com >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm looking at the 3.6.x branch of the wp8 repo, and seeing some strange >>> things: >>> >>> - the 3.6.0 tag is not at the head of the 3.6.x branch. It's not at the >>> head of master either. It looks to be on a branch that has no head. Doesn't >>> make sense to me. >>> - the addition of "bundledDependencies" to the package.json [f5453b9] is >>> not in the 3.6.x branch. But it is on that unnamed branch with the 3.6.0 >>> tag. >>> - the removal of "-dev" from package.json [f6690f1] is not fully in the >>> 3.6.x branch. It still says "-dev" in the description property. But it is >>> on that unnamed branch with the 3.6.0 tag. >>> >>> I'm thinking this should get cleaned up before packaging. I could >>> cherry-pick the 2 commits from the unnamed branch to the 3.6.x branch and >>> visually inspect the resulting package.json, and move the 3.6.0 tag, or is >>> there a different approach that should be used here? >>> >>> I'll package up windows and android in the meantime.
