What if each webview implementation injected it's own exec function? This would/could apply also to platform's webviews. The cordova-js version of exec, could simply queue exec calls if they happened pre-deviceready.
I have experimented with this in the past, and verified that Windows, WP8, and iOS could easily support it. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hmm, yeah, CordovaBridge is very much tied to the idea that a bridge has > prompt mode, which tells the origin, and a js mode which uses a token to > verify it's trusted. Both of these concepts are fairly > webview-implementation specific. > > The only thing in there that seems webview-agnostic is the reset() > function. So, maybe create a CordovaBridge abstract base class that just > has reset() and make that what the webview impl uses as its type? > > Not sure if that's along the lines of what you're thinking... > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey > > > > I'm still working on the Mozilla Bridge and I'm running into problems > with > > how non-modular the current bridge is and how it was abstracted. When we > > created the ExposedJsApi class and added it to the API, we did so because > > we may need to abstract the whole bridge later. However, right now both > > Crosswalk and Android WebView share the CordovaBridge, including its > > encoding. Since GeckoView now has its own bridge (which includes some JS > > code that needs to override the Android defaults), I'm wondering whether > we > > should expose the CordovaBridge and allow it to be implemented or not. > > There is a lot of shared code, but at the same time I don't know how much > > code will be shared between the MozillaView and the default. > > > > Either way, I'm getting pretty close to a workable prototype soon and > then > > we can start work on getting the MobileSpec tests passing. Once the > plugin > > is broken out so that it can be installed using plugman or the CLI, we > can > > get more people looking at it. > > > > But yeah, any thoughts on this would be great. > > > > Joe > > >
