Hi everyone, I agree with using github for more than easier for the person submitting the pull request, I think it's a healthier and more open way of working anyone can find, read, and comment on propose changes and fixes.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote: > They are zapped! > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > sounds good to remove! > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Yeah, kill it. gh-pulls are much easier to review I think. > > >> > > >> @purplecabbage > > >> risingj.com > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > What's reviewboard? > > >> > > > >> > j/k, yeah kill it! > > >> > On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 1:13:55 PM Andrew Grieve < > [email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Anyone still interested in using ReviewBoard? I feel like we gave > > it a > > >> > > decent shot, but github pull requests are working better. > > >> > > > > >> > > If no one objects, I'm going to delete the .reviewboardrc files > from > > >> the > > >> > > repos and update > > >> > > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/code-reviews.md > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- Carlos Santana <[email protected]>
