I don't think we need to re-start since no one's -'ve voted, and nothing would be different. Feel free to start voting! :)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > So...since nobody voted on this thread, I think it's safe to say the vote > failed. We should probably re-start this soon. > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM Treggiari, Leo <leo.treggi...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about > whitelist > > support? > > Sorry that I missed that. > > > > Leo > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release > > > > Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread. > > > > On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <leo.treggi...@intel.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong! > > > > > > The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist in > > > order > > > to get a whitelist implemented correctly. > > > > > > Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node component. > > > > > > The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm? > > > Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes? > > > Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work? > > > > > > It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation. > > > > > > Leo > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com <javascript:;>] > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;> > > > Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release > > > > > > Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a > > > config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds > > > their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers. > > > > > > Or does this just impact newly created projects? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Leo > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: mmo...@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmo...@google.com > > > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM > > > To: dev > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release > > > > > > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what > the > > > whitelist changes are: > > > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35 > > > > > > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my > > > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should > look > > > like). > > > > > > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should > we > > > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format? > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org > > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release. > > > > > > > > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833 > > > > > > > > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833 > > > > > > > > The package was published from its corresponding git tag: > > > > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4) > > > > > > > > Note that you can test it out via: > > > > > > > > cordova platform add > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0 > > > > > > > > Blog post to review is here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md > > > > > > > > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it > > to > > > > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post. > > > > > > > > Voting guidelines: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md > > > > > > > > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours. > > > > > > > > I vote +1: > > > > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos > > > > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and > subdependencies > > > > have Apache-compatible licenses > > > > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening > > > > * Verified contents of archive > > > > > > > > > B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB� > > > � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[ > > > � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[ > > > � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B > > > > > >
