I also like scoped packages but am against another rename. Haha. I know organizations are coming soon so we will be able to create the Cordova organization and I believe scope packages that way. Add PMC members to the organization to be able to publish instead of relying on a Cordova npm user account.
Lets wait and see how it goes. On Apr 20, 2015 2:29 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > re: the scoped package id, I like it, but not sure we want to change them > again ... and how much of our existing world will it break. Can we install > an '@' id currently on all platforms? It will result in a > www/plugins/@cordova/plugin-device/ folder right now, won't it? > > re: other questions > Personally, I would rather see only committers able to publish to our scope > (assuming we go that way), just like we wanted to prevent non committers > from using org.apache.cordova namespace. > > I considered 'cordova plugin add device' awhile back, I was going to do it > directly in plugman, but I decided against it. Currently it would mean a > 3rd attempt to find the plugin over http; 1) cpr, 2) npm, 3)munge name and > go back to npm > By this time, I think I would just ask the user what they really want. > We could also do this via cordova-registry-mapper aliases. > > > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) < > panar...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > Scopes are like namespaces. In the reverse domain name world, > > org.apache.cordova was considered a namespace, right ? > > > > We did not want non core packages to publish to that namespace, so does > > the same argument apply ? > > > > Alternatively, we can think of scope as packages that apply to a > > particular environment - for example, all cordova packages would be > > @cordova scope. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michal Mocny [mailto:mmo...@google.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 2:03 PM > > To: dev > > Subject: Re: Scoped package names for npm? > > > > Other questions to answer: > > - Can 3rd-parties publish to this scope? > > - Do we want them to? > > - Do we want to default to @cordova scope if none is provided, such that > > you could do `cordova plugin add device`? > > > > -Michal > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@google.com> wrote: > > > > > https://docs.npmjs.com/getting-started/scoped-packages > > > > > > Should we be @cordova/plugin-device instead of cordova-plugin-device? > > > > > > -Michal > > > > > >
