It should be replaced with 14. This was definitely an oversight since we all agreed in theory but never came to a proper decision.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:20 PM Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) < v-seg...@microsoft.com> wrote: > I still see minSdkVersion = 10 (GINGERBREAD) in platform template. Should > it be replaced w/ 14 (ICE_CREAM_SANDWICH) in this case and also updated in > platform docs? - per docs we still support Gingerbread. > > Steve is currently working on docs update so this is perfect time to > change this. > > -Sergey > -----Original Message----- > From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 1:04 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: Deprecation Wars: ICS vs Gingerbread > > Joe, perhaps that can be part of the Tools Release blog post? Steve put > out a link to the draft in another thread. > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Resurrecting this thread! > > > > I think we need to let our users know that Cordova 4.0 doesn't support > > Gingerbread, or at least some of the features don't work on Gingerbread. > > I've been trying to clean up the JIRA a bit today, and it seems that > > while we came to a consensus to drop 2.3, we didn't tell anyone. :/ > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:41 PM Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Firefox works on 2.3, and Chrome does not. It also depends on the > >> device > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, 12:20 PM Josh Soref <jso...@blackberry.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Michal Mocny wrote: > >>> >... we aren't telling those individuals that they cannot use their > >>> >phones, we are telling developers that want to create new > >>> >applications for that target to either build mobile web, packaged > >>> >native, or just stick to existing versions of cordova if really > needed. > >>> > > >>> >I do not buy the argument that you are doing those individuals with > >>> >those phones a favour by building them hybrid apps using the > >>> >antiquated 2.3 webview on antiquated machine specs. > >>> > >>> I don't have an opinion on this. But I do have a question. > >>> > >>> Ignoring the fact that GeckoView is flaky today, > >>> > >>> 1. Does GeckoView / Firefox work (at all? well?) on a sample / > >>> typical 2.3 device? > >>> 2. Can I run Chrome (or some relative) on that same device (at all? > >>> well?) > >>> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org >
