Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225#issuecomment-104784245
So, I discussed this a bit with Steve, and he brought up an interesting
point.
A stretch goal is to not have a plugin.xml file at all, and simply use
package.json for the entire plugin definition.
Given that the `<name>` tag only exists in plugin.xml, could be removed,
and is not unique ( which I see you handle ) does it still make sense to push
users to rely on a convenience function that we may end up removing? The name
property in a package.json IS the id.
Potentially we could also add a cordova.name field to package.json
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
