I think it's a web of trust thing http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/6841/ways-to-sign-gpg-public-key-so-it-is-trusted I signed Steve's key, but you won't trust it unless you sign my key, and so on.. there must be a link of trust. But then I signed his key and I still get this warning, so...
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure. Try GPG Keychain -> Key -> Update Key From Server (after > selecting Steve's key) > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> So I need to re-import all the pgp keys? >> >> I just did the two import commands here: >> >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/setting-up-gpg.md#importing-pmc-members-pgp-keys >> >> Do I need to do it again? >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I think someone else on the team needs to key sign Steve's key (use GPG >> > Keychain). I just did for both his apache and gmail keys. >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Homer, Tony <tony.ho...@intel.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks for replying Steve - I see what you mean about dependencies, >> > hadn't >> > > thought about that. >> > > >> > > When I did `coho verify-archive` I got "gpg: WARNING: This key is not >> > > certified with a trusted signature!". >> > > I guess this is ok, but is there any way to address the warning? >> > > >> > > >> > > On 8/13/15, 2:47 PM, "Steven Gill" <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > >Audit license headers is the important one. >> > > > >> > > >At the end of the day, we aren't shipping any of our dependencies. >> They >> > > >are >> > > >all downloaded by our users. We can contact module authors who don't >> > have >> > > >license listed to get them to list one. >> > > > >> > > >-Steve >> > > > >> > > >On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Homer, Tony <tony.ho...@intel.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> I'm trying to validate the tools release. >> > > >> I'm following the instructions[1], but I haven't used coho before >> and >> > am >> > > >> not sure about the results. >> > > >> >> > > >> `coho audit-license-headers -r js -r lib -r cli -r plugman` >> > > >> The doc warns that audit-license-headers has false positives, so >> I'm >> > > >> ignoring the following results: >> > > >> ./appveyor.yml >> > > >> ./tasks/vendor/commonjs-tests/* >> > > >> ./tasks/vendor/jasmine/* >> > > >> ./spec-cordova/* >> > > >> ./spec-plugman/* >> > > >> ./src/plugman/help.txt >> > > >> Are these are all false positives? >> > > >> If yes, I think the audit-license-headers results are ok. >> > > >> >> > > >> `coho check-license -r tools` >> > > >> I got a lot of results so I started adding what I think are false >> > > >> positives to the license filter: >> > > >> "ISC","Public Domain","WTFPL","ASF","Unlicense","Artistic-2.0" >> > > >> I also updated to nlf 1.3.2 in order to get nicer output and a fix >> for >> > > >>the >> > > >> single license under licenses bug [2]. >> > > >> I still get 88 results for packages with no license entry in >> > > >>package.json. >> > > >> (plus xmldom, which has a syntax error in the license entry but >> has an >> > > >> Apache-compatible license) >> > > >> >> > > >> Are "ISC","Public Domain","WTFPL","ASF","Unlicense","Artistic-2.0" >> all >> > > >> Apache-compatible? >> > > >> Are packages with no license entry ok - any additonal action >> required? >> > > >> Should I submit a PR to add the additional license strings to the >> > filter >> > > >> and update nlf? >> > > >> >> > > >> [1] >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/tools-release-pro >> > > >>cess.md#test >> > > >> [2] https://github.com/iandotkelly/nlf/pull/22 >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >