I'll try to add a redirect in .htaccess to point 6.0.0 to 6.x On Jan 29, 2016 7:35 PM, "Steven Gill" <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Sorry. I was just trying to get it out asap. I'll look into updating > it on Sunday/Monday. > On Jan 29, 2016 7:09 PM, "Carlos Santana" <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:47 PM Nikhil Khandelwal <nikhi...@microsoft.com >> > >> wrote: >> >> > Looks we did a release for the docs with the tools release. Is it >> possible >> > to name it 6.x instead of 6.0.0? All URLs to 6.0.0 will break if we do >> that >> > but we should do that sooner rather than later to minimize impact. >> > >> > As discussed, micro-versioning of docs does not buy us much. I'll >> enhance >> > our cordova-docs readme and editorial guide for docs with details on >> how we >> > handle versioning. >> > >> > -Nikhil >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:50 PM >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: Docs versioning scheme >> > >> > SGTM! +1 >> > >> > >> > @purplecabbage >> > >> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=risingj.com&data=01%7c01%7cnikhilkh%40microsoft.com%7c82dab60846b14dded12d08d322b54957%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=fiC5HqwZWlaOSZD4ipn97isk7hjFjVCht9IzgKZKnFA%3d >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal >> > > <nikhi...@microsoft.com >> > > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Should we version our docs on every major version (instead of minor >> > > > version) of cordova CLI that comes out? Should the next version of >> > > > the >> > > docs >> > > > be "6.x"? Honestly, not much changes every minor release and >> > > > maintaining multiple copies has quite a few downsides w.r.t. SEO >> > > > (referring to older versions of docs), slow docs builds, huge >> website >> > duplication. >> > > > >> > > > Lot of our docs relate to platform updates and we need clear >> > > > sections within them that specify the version of the platform for >> > > > which the docs apply to. For example, Android 5.1 will introduce new >> > > > lifetime concepts which will be part of Cordova 6.0 docs release. >> > > > It's best for the text of the docs itself to have something along >> > > > the lines of "This applies to cordova-android > 5.1" >> > > > >> > > > Similarly, significant future updates to CLI/Lib features can >> > > > contain the same "This applies to cordova > 6.2". >> > > > >> > > > I think it will lead to a simpler model on our website and prevent >> > > > future version explosion [1]. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Nikhil >> > > > >> > > > [1] >> > > > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fimgu >> > > > r.com%2fvkeNvUL&data=01%7c01%7cnikhilkh%40microsoft.com >> %7c82dab60846 >> > > > b14dded12d08d322b54957%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata= >> > > > Yh%2b9h4MUN9VfUADA1unTmUExqioMs75xG1HjVYmDSBc%3d >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
