Oh great! I have not taken a close look at the implementation itself. Perhaps 
you already had some of this in mind.

As for the syntax for changing attributes, I would recommend something like 
this:

<config-file target="AndroidManifest.xml" parent="/manifest/application" 
attributeName="android:name" attirbuteValue="MyApplication"/>

Also, we should always prioritize config.xml edits over plugin.xml (giving the 
end developer the full control). In case of conflicts, between plugins & 
config.xml we should warn and mention which one we picked (config.xml)

Thanks,
Nikhil

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Tran [mailto:ktop...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:40 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Android] Need a solution to config.xml and AndroidManifest.xml 
feature requests

Hi,

I made an attempt at the functionality of being able to add attributes with the 
config-file tag. It's not completed yet, but I wanted to get some review before 
I proceed.
With my changes, you can add an attribute through the config-file tag in 
plugin.xml when the plugin is added, and when the plugin is removed, the 
attribute will get removed.
https://github.com/ktop/cordova-lib/tree/cb-11023

This is what the tag looks like:
*    <config-file target="AndroidManifest.xml"
parent="/manifest/application" attr="true">*
*            android:name="MyApplication"*

*    </config-file>*

Added *attr* attribute to let Config-File know that we want to add an 
attribute. Default should be false and will expect an element rather than an 
attribute.

One issue I have is that it can only add 1 attribute per config-file tag.
This is the part that I still need to fix.

Can someone review what I have so far?

Thanks,
Karen

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Simon MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I would love to but I have a few other things to handle first. If 
> someone else picks it up before I get to it then that's cool with me.
>
>
> Simon Mac Donald
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhi.im%
> 2fsimonmacdonald&data=01%7c01%7cnikhilkh%40microsoft.com%7c379bf4c2dae
> 4454ee13008d369539a2b%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=TvJ
> lf2LDyl%2bfSbRMDPjmLe%2fMBQf7PnAzRao5QANRrH4%3d
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Oh so it means you don't want to work on the code :-p
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:50 PM Simon MacDonald <
> simon.macdon...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, I put a watch on that.
> > >
> > >
> > > Simon Mac Donald
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhi
> > > .im%2fsimonmacdonald&data=01%7c01%7cnikhilkh%40microsoft.com%7c379
> > > bf4c2dae4454ee13008d369539a2b%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7
> > > c1&sdata=TvJlf2LDyl%2bfSbRMDPjmLe%2fMBQf7PnAzRao5QANRrH4%3d
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Carlos Santana 
> > > <csantan...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Simon, I was not able to find a JIRA, I created a new JIRA [1] 
> > > > to
> > enhance
> > > > plugin.xml to allow <config-file> to add attributes
> > > >
> > > > [1]: 
> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2
> > > > fissues.apache.org%2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-11023&data=01%7c01%7cnik
> > > > hilkh%40microsoft.com%7c379bf4c2dae4454ee13008d369539a2b%7c72f98
> > > > 8bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=qdtAQlq84gu4iot23V%2bdCyw4
> > > > yAtardggCzFXJutYDzU%3d
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:30 AM Simon MacDonald < 
> > > > simon.macdon...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Seems like editing attributes in a config-file is a wanted
> > enhancement.
> > > > Do
> > > > > we have a JIRA for it?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Simon Mac Donald
> > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%
> > > > > 2fhi.im%2fsimonmacdonald&data=01%7c01%7cnikhilkh%40microsoft.c
> > > > > om%7c379bf4c2dae4454ee13008d369539a2b%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d
> > > > > 7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=TvJlf2LDyl%2bfSbRMDPjmLe%2fMBQf7PnAzRao5Q
> > > > > ANRrH4%3d
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Carlos Santana <
> > csantan...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I agree to enable config.xml to be able to set or override 
> > > > > > using config-file (i.e. any xml file including strings.xml) 
> > > > > > I also think that adding support in config.xml and 
> > > > > > plugin.xml to
> > edit
> > > > > > attributes is very helpful, this is exactly what we are 
> > > > > > doing for
> > one
> > > > of
> > > > > > our plugin to add the attribute android:name for 
> > > > > > <application>
> and
> > it
> > > > > was a
> > > > > > pain, and I think we still have problems doing it from 
> > > > > > before_plugin_install hook, it would be easier from 
> > > > > > plugin.xml
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:55 AM julio cesar sanchez < 
> > > > > > jcesarmob...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, Simon, that's my opinion, and we should show the
> conficting
> > > > values
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > the id of the plugin with the conficting values so the 
> > > > > > > user
> knows
> > > he
> > > > > has
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > change the values on the config.xml or remove the plugin.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But we still will have problems if the plugin uses a hook 
> > > > > > > to
> > write
> > > > > values
> > > > > > > instead of using the config-file tag
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2016-03-22 15:11 GMT+01:00 Alexis Kofman <
> > alexis.kof...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maybe the configured values of the plugins are sometimes 
> > > > > > > > just
> > > > default
> > > > > > > > values that the user can override through the config.xml
> file.
> > > > > > > > What about adding a flag indicating whether the value is
> > > > overridable
> > > > > ?
> > > > > > > My 2
> > > > > > > > cents ...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Simon MacDonald < 
> > > > > > > > simon.macdon...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So for Android's case you are thinking the order of
> > precedence
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > be:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > config.xml
> > > > > > > > > plugin.xml
> > > > > > > > > AndroidManifest.xml // created by the "cordova" cli
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then if config.xml overrides something that one of the
> > plugins
> > > > > > depends
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > then the app won't build. I can actually get behind 
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > proposal
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > > > understanding you correctly.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Simon Mac Donald
> > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=htt
> > > > > > > > > p%3a%2f%2fhi.im%2fsimonmacdonald&data=01%7c01%7cnikhil
> > > > > > > > > kh%40microsoft.com%7c379bf4c2dae4454ee13008d369539a2b%
> > > > > > > > > 7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=TvJlf2LDy
> > > > > > > > > l%2bfSbRMDPjmLe%2fMBQf7PnAzRao5QANRrH4%3d
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:51 AM, julio cesar sanchez < 
> > > > > > > > > jcesarmob...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I think, if there is a conflict between config.xml 
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > plugin.xml
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > > not build.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If we pick config.xml values, the plugins with
> conflicting
> > > > values
> > > > > > > might
> > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > work, and if we pick the plugin.xml values, the app 
> > > > > > > > > > might
> > not
> > > > > work
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > way
> > > > > > > > > > the user wants.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I think both options are bad, the user wants the 
> > > > > > > > > > plugin
> to
> > > work
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > the values he manually added and both aren't 
> > > > > > > > > > possible if
> > > there
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > conflicts.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2016-03-22 13:28 GMT+01:00 Simon MacDonald <
> > > > > > > simon.macdon...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > When it comes to the AndroidManifest if config.xml 
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > plugin.xml
> > > > > > > > > > (possibly
> > > > > > > > > > > multiple plugin.xml's) disagree on the value of an
> > > attribute:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > - if the value is a boolean then it should default 
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > 'false'.
> > > > > > For
> > > > > > > > > > instance
> > > > > > > > > > > if it is an attribute like supports small screens 
> > > > > > > > > > > if
> one
> > > > plugin
> > > > > > > sets
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > false it should be false for or else the app may 
> > > > > > > > > > > not
> > build.
> > > > > > > > > > > - if the value is a integer then it should default 
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> the
> > > > > highest
> > > > > > > > > integer
> > > > > > > > > > > provided. For instance minimum SDK version, again 
> > > > > > > > > > > have
> to
> > > > pick
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > highest
> > > > > > > > > > > or the app won't build.
> > > > > > > > > > > - if the value is a string, damned if I know if 
> > > > > > > > > > > there
> are
> > > > > > conflicts
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > multiple plugin.xml files but plugin.xml should 
> > > > > > > > > > > take
> > > > precedence
> > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > > > > config.xml.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Sound reasonable?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Simon Mac Donald
> > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url
> > > > > > > > > > > =http%3a%2f%2fhi.im%2fsimonmacdonald&data=01%7c01%
> > > > > > > > > > > 7cnikhilkh%40microsoft.com%7c379bf4c2dae4454ee1300
> > > > > > > > > > > 8d369539a2b%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1
> > > > > > > > > > > &sdata=TvJlf2LDyl%2bfSbRMDPjmLe%2fMBQf7PnAzRao5QAN
> > > > > > > > > > > RrH4%3d
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Parashuram N <
> > > > > > > > panar...@microsoft.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The disagreement could also like in a “preference”
> > > > > specifying a
> > > > > > > > > value,
> > > > > > > > > > > > that is overwritten by this fragment.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/21/16, 11:28 PM, "Jesse" <
> purplecabb...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >I like having the same xml fragments in 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >config.xml
> as
> > we
> > > > use
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > plugin.xml
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ><platform name="android">
> > > > > > > > > > > > >    <config-file target="AndroidManifest.xml"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >parent="/manifest/application">
> > > > > > > > > > > > >        <activity android:name="
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=com.foo.Foo&data=01
> %7c01%7cpanarasi%40microsoft.com%7c79eba6a8336a4e77391d08d3521b3bd2%7c
> 72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=MPgaRi3qGueHAnmnV6tXJyRlIzQ
> Iu6gHxeYTnpiKR9c%3d
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > >android:label="@string/app_name">
> > > > > > > > > > > > >            <intent-filter>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >            </intent-filter>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >        </activity>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >    </config-file> </platform>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >We will need to address precedence, as a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >plugin.xml
> > and
> > > > > > > config.xml
> > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > >disagree.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mar 21, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Shazron <
> > > > shaz...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Continuing on Simon's point, we already have
> > > duplication
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > entries
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> for preference tags in
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fissue
> s.apache.org%2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-9264&data=01%7c01%7cpanarasi%40micro
> soft.com%7c79eba6a8336a4e77391d08d3521b3bd2%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7c
> d011db47%7c1&sdata=Amj46nGpbpE3scp6sjDw1FemeGton2Hu6YSyQqZNT4M%3d
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> and a post-processing step does the removal 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> of
> > dupes.
> > > > Not
> > > > > > sure
> > > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> removal method would be adequate (as long as 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> the
> > > desired
> > > > > tag
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> express is written to the config file *last*)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Simon 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> I agree the config-file is the way to go but 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> we
> > need
> > > to
> > > > > go
> > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > step
> > > > > > > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> and enable the changing of attributes in the
> config
> > > > file
> > > > > > > > instead
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> adding lines to AndroidManifest.xml. For
> instance,
> > > the
> > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > bug
> > > > > > > > > > > > CB-10894
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> talks about adding a preference for screen sizes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> The default AndroidManifest.xml that is 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> created
> > with
> > > > > > Cordova
> > > > > > > > > > Android
> > > > > > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> add the line:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>    <supports-screens android:anyDensity="true"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >android:largeScreens="true"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> android:normalScreens="true"
> > > android:resizeable="true"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> android:smallScreens="true"
> > > > android:xlargeScreens="true"
> > > > > />
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> and if you want to make smallScreens="false" 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> you
> > have
> > > > no
> > > > > > way
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > doing
> > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > >as
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> it adds a duplicate line if you are using 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> the
> > > > config-file
> > > > > > way
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > doing
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> things. We really need attribute level
> granularity
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > config-file
> > > > > > > > > > > > >tag.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Simon Mac Donald
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhi.im%
> 2fsimonmacdonald&data=01%7c01%7cpanarasi%40microsoft.com%7c79eba6a8336
> a4e77391d08d3521b3bd2%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=%2f
> THN2714ZxbZ7blck0JpCvz2U%2fLEFSzVDQP2mTLSMm8%3d
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Richard 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Knoll <
> > > > > > > > > > > rikn...@microsoft.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> I agree that config-file is the way to go. 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> After
> > an
> > > > > > offline
> > > > > > > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> with Nikhil, Parashu, and Jason, one 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> question
> that
> > > > came
> > > > > up
> > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > whether
> > > > > > > > > > > > >all
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> of this native config stuff belongs in
> config.xml
> > or
> > > > > > should
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > separated
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> out. One idea would be to define separate 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> files
> > for
> > > > each
> > > > > > > > > > > configuration
> > > > > > > > > > > > >file
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> you wish to modify (something like
> > > > > > > AndroidManifest.merge.xml).
> > > > > > > > > > Those
> > > > > > > > > > > > >files
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> would follow the same format as the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> config-file
> > tag
> > > > and
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > add
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> entries to build.json or config.xml 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> specifying
> > what
> > > > > native
> > > > > > > > > config
> > > > > > > > > > > each
> > > > > > > > > > > > >file
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> modifies. It breaks from how we do it in
> > plugin.xml,
> > > > but
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > prevents
> > > > > > > > > > > > >having
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> gigantic config.xml files that are mostly
> composed
> > > of
> > > > > > native
> > > > > > > > > > > > fragments.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >The
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> current config file mixing that we do is
> somewhat
> > > > messy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Richard
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> From: Alexis Kofman [mailto:
> > alexis.kof...@gmail.com
> > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 1:39 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [Android] Need a solution to
> > config.xml
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> AndroidManifest.xml feature requests
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hello all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> I agree with Julio that it is less 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> confusing
> > > keeping
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > > > > mecanism
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> that the one it already exists with the
> > plugin.xml.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Le 21 mars 2016 19:17, "julio cesar 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> sanchez" <
> > > > > > > > > > > jcesarmob...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> écrit :
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> I think we should add the config-file tag 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> to
> the
> > > > > > > config.xml.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> It's already implemented on the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> plugin.xml. It
> > > allows
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > modify
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the AndroidManifest.xml or the info.plist 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> when
> > you
> > > > > > install
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > plugin.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> But the number of plugins that just modify 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the
> > > > > > > > > > AndroidManifest.xml
> > > > > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> info.plist is increasing, I think that 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> should
> be
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > config.xml
> > > > > > > > > > > > too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> So we don't duplicate anything with our 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> own
> tags,
> > > we
> > > > > just
> > > > > > > let
> > > > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > > > add
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> whatever they want from the config-file tag.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> And if something can't be edited from the
> > > config-file
> > > > > > tag,
> > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > tell
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> them to create a hook.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Phonegap build uses the config-file tag on 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the
> > > > > config.xml
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > allow
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> their users to edit the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> AndroidManifest.xml and
> > the
> > > > > > > > info.plist
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> @Parashuram idea might work on android, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> but I
> > think
> > > > we
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> something that can be used on all the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> platforms
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> 2016-03-21 18:40 GMT+01:00 Parashuram N <
> > > > > > > > > panar...@microsoft.com
> > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Given that we are now using Gradle for 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> builds,
> > > could
> > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > > > simply
> > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> gradle sub-projects that define an
> > > > > AndroidManifest.xml,
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > gets
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> merged during Android build ? One way 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> could be
> > to
> > > > > > support
> > > > > > > > > > > specifying
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> "sub-projects" in config.xml, and these
> changes
> > > get
> > > > > > picked
> > > > > > > > up.
> > > > > > > > > > > Would
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> it work for all cases ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> From: Joe Bowser 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 10:07 AM
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Subject: [Android] Need a solution to
> config.xml
> > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> AndroidManifest.xml feature requests
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Hey
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> So, if you've been paying attention to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the
> JIRA,
> > > > we've
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > getting
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> slammed with a ton of feature 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> requests/bugs
> > > > regarding
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Android
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Manifest
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> where people want to add a 1:1 mapping 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> between
> > the
> > > > two
> > > > > > XML
> > > > > > > > > > files.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> The thing is that it's getting out of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> control,
> > and
> > > > we
> > > > > > need
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > find a
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> better solution to this problem.  I'm not 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> sure
> > > what
> > > > a
> > > > > > > better
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> solution to this is, but if you want to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> see
> some
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > issues
> > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> are related to this, here's a small list:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fi
> > > ssue
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> s.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > %2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-10894&data=01%7c01%7cpanarasi%40micr
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> osoft.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > %7c4430fe17c9d94a96f19608d351ab4028%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > cd011db47%7c1&sdata=f3qD84Rx%2bc%2bDzryeeXDCIX%2bhrCk%2boM%2f26%2f
> > > T5OA
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> y9RMA%3d
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fi
> > > ssue
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> s.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > %2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-10917&data=01%7c01%7cpanarasi%40micr
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> osoft.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > %7c4430fe17c9d94a96f19608d351ab4028%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > cd011db47%7c1&sdata=I1ycCL25rWlN4uTU%2fPXFBkv1PYXrDeX6dF6%2fMzyNSb
> > > E%3d
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fi
> > > ssue
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> s.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > %2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-8159&data=01%7c01%7cpanarasi%40micro
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> soft.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > %7c4430fe17c9d94a96f19608d351ab4028%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7c
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > d011db47%7c1&sdata=HS3ZRL%2fxY%2fJWZo5eMQPGFO6BS2W03z13va8NV7sZpjo
> > > %3d
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fi
> > > ssue
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> s.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > %2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-10755&data=01%7c01%7cpanarasi%40micr
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> osoft.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > %7c4430fe17c9d94a96f19608d351ab4028%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > cd011db47%7c1&sdata=PeZms4TWbWqHInf%2fnYYbL3e5o9aB3Ijcl8fQxoUmsgU%
> > > 3d
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fi
> > > ssue
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> s.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > %2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-8976&data=01%7c01%7cpanarasi%40micro
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> soft.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > %7c4430fe17c9d94a96f19608d351ab4028%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7c
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > d011db47%7c1&sdata=4VoysIEst8o7k3kvkyYu9MeBDF8VZ3q7aG6oLcoCN2w%3d
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> All of these are either indirectly or 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> directly
> > > > related
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> AndroidManifest, and it's clear that if 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> we
> just
> > > > > allowed
> > > > > > > > people
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> edit an AndroidManifest, or at least 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> allow
> > > portions
> > > > of
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> immutable, we
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> would
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> be better off.  Obviously, plugins that
> install
> > > > > > > third-party
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> activities
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> and
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> content providers would have to edit the
> > manifest,
> > > > > but I
> > > > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> things
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> are getting out of hand with the things 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> that
> > > people
> > > > > want
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > control
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> from config.xml.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> What do people think? Does anyone have a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> good
> > > > solution
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > >problem?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Are we really abstracting anything out by
> > > > duplicating
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> config in our own config.xml?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Alexis Kofman
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org

Reply via email to