Agreed. I'm not even sure why we need this plugin, but I will most likely ignore it like I do the statusbar plugin, which I also thought wasn't necessary.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Darryl Pogue <dar...@dpogue.ca> wrote: > I think this is a good feature to have as a supported core plugin, but I > also worry about feature creep and endless bikeshedding like we see with > the statusbar plugin. > > The originally linked plugin acts as a polyfill for the W3C spec[1]. This > new core plugin should do the same, and should ruthlessly defend that > stance: > *Any feature that falls outside the scope of a polyfill should not be > implemented, nor considered a bug against the plugin.* Instead it should be > filed as a bug on the W3C spec. > > [1]: https://www.w3.org/TR/screen-orientation/ > > On 11 May 2016 at 12:29, Kerri Shotts <ke...@photokandy.com> wrote: > > > +1; Agree. I've seen many questions about controlling orientation, so > > having a core plugin to reply with would be nice to have. > > >
