I was going to say something more witty here, but I haven't had coffee yet. :P
I think I'm going to start another thread for a 5.2 release at this point, since I want to see that happen before 6.0.x On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > That was a typo. > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Simon MacDonald < > simon.macdon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> LGTM too. >> >> Although is "Cordova-Android as a distributable APK" supposed to be >> "Cordova-Android >> as a distributable AAR"? >> >> >> Simon Mac Donald >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > LGTM >> > I don't think Android N is going to change that much like you said. >> > >> > Let's move forward as usual , create a branch 6.x on main repo and start >> > that release stream >> > >> > Start landing features from the list below and have a board to track was >> > left. When it's done it's done when ever that's it and we release >> > regardless of official date of Android N (it might along or be bit >> after) >> > >> > And as normal process we need to care and feed both branches (master & >> > 6.x) having them green and CI testing as Android N builds come out. >> > >> > Any plugins need a 6.x branch corresponding to cordova-android@6.x >> > branch, I don't think so but is good to ask. >> > >> > - Carlos >> > @csantanapr >> > >> > > On May 24, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > I picked September because it's after when Android N is released. The >> > > items on the list don't depend on each other. >> > > >> > > Also, we use semver so us breaking an API or making a major breaking >> > change >> > > means a major bump. Not all of these are API breaking, and in fact >> only >> > > the Android Studio project structure and the Thread-Safe bridge breaks >> > > stuff. >> > > >> > > I don't want to make a 6.0 and a 7.0 for the two major breaking >> changes >> > and >> > > would rather group the two together since they're both related but not >> > > dependent. >> > > >> > > >> > >> On Tue, May 24, 2016, 12:58 PM Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Why the Sept. date? >> > >> >> > >> Because Android N actually exists in August sometime, but I don't >> have >> > a >> > >> solid date. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> All these items depend on each other and will take until Sept. to >> get it >> > >> implemented? >> > >> >> > >> No, but >> > >> >> > >> Each of them break APIs that required a major bump version? >> > >> >> > >> Can we implement one first let's say June call it 6.0 and continue >> > >> releasing each month or as features get implemented 6.1, 6.2, etc. . >> > >> >> > >> Which will be the first one that make most sense to implement? New >> > Studio >> > >> Project? >> > >> >> > >> - Carlos >> > >> @csantanapr >> > >> >> > >>> On May 24, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> Hey >> > >>> >> > >>> Since Google IO didn't really throw any new features at us, and >> since >> > >>> Google hinted at Android N being released at the end of August, do >> > people >> > >>> think that aiming for a Cordova-Android 6.0.x release in September >> with >> > >> the >> > >>> following features makes sense: >> > >>> >> > >>> * Android Studio project structure >> > >>> * Android N Multi-Window Support >> > >>> * Thread-Safe bridge by default >> > >>> * Cordova-Android as a distributable APK >> > >>> >> > >>> I know that we had an earlier thread about this, but now that IO is >> > over, >> > >>> we should probably ramp things up now that we know that we're not >> > waiting >> > >>> until November for a new version of Android to land. The biggest >> > change >> > >> is >> > >>> the Android Studio project structure, and everything else has been >> > >> sitting >> > >>> in branches for months ready to be merged in. >> > >>> >> > >>> Also, I know a lot of people are waiting for the change to version >> > >> numbers >> > >>> where we don't magically generate version numbers for arch-neutral >> APKs >> > >> as >> > >>> well as other script changes to the build, so I think we should do >> > >> another >> > >>> Cordova release to address those issues soon. >> > >>> >> > >>> Thoughts? >> > >>> >> > >>> Joe >> > >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org >> > >> > >> > >