Yes, I was talking about that. I only see a big "Authorize Github" button there. Will try it when I find time. Thanks for testing.
Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 11:13 Uhr schrieb Jan Piotrowski < piotrow...@gmail.com>: > > How do we get apps unlocked for organization access? > > Just request access using the GitHub dialog that pops up, or doe we have > to file INFRA tickets? > > I don't think anyone has tried that before. > > If the question was directed at the > https://github-issue-mover.appspot.com/ I posted, it doesn't need any > access. Just paste the issue URL in the left input, the target repo in > the right one. Result: > https://github.com/apache/cordova-discuss/issues/109 > https://github.com/apache/cordova/issues/2 > > If not, I am happy to have tried the move functionality anyway ;) > Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 11:10 Uhr schrieb <raphine...@gmail.com>: > > > > How do we get apps unlocked for organization access? > > Just request access using the GitHub dialog that pops up, or doe we have > to > > file INFRA tickets? > > > > While I found it very nice to have some dedicated space for higher level > > design discussions, cordova-discuss > > is heavily unmaintained and feedback to any issues was pretty much > > non-existent anyway. > > So I'm fine with whatever happens to it. > > > > Furthermore, with all decisions having to go through the mailing list, I > > suggest simply using that for any design discussions. > > > > Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 10:59 Uhr schrieb Jan Piotrowski < > > piotrow...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Issues can be moved e.g. with https://github-issue-mover.appspot.com/. > > > As the issues were a thing of keeping track of stuff, I think > > > @raphinesse and @brodybits who created most of those issue should take > > > care of moving their issues to the appropriate repo or close them > > > themselves, so they are aware where they ended up. > > > Then issues in cordova-discuss are taken care of. > > > > > > Looking at the actual `proposals` folder in cordova-discuss, this is > > > pretty outdated anyway. Moving those somewhere else doesn't really > > > make sense as we would not delete cordova-discuss but archive it > > > anyway. > > > The open Pull Requests are more recent and relevant. > > > > > > So the open question is if we want to move the "proposal" process with > > > actual files in a `proposals` folder, or modify it so the proposals > > > are put into the issue description itself. This looses the possibility > > > to comment on specific lines, but you can of course always quote > > > things in your comment. Is there a specific reason we have "proposals > > > as files"? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 10:20 Uhr schrieb Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > > > > It's mainly about discoverability, now that we have `cordova` repo > > > > itself (one stop shop for general issues?). `discuss` repo was there > > > > as you mentioned for historical reasons. Now that we have the > > > > `cordova` repo, and we can discuss in the Issues of that repo, > another > > > > repo for discussion is redundant IMO. We could move issues from one > > > > repo to another, if need be (not sure how, without some bot like > > > > Probot) > > > > > > > > In any case if we don't want to move that is fine as well, since all > > > > PRs and Issues are reflected in the commits@ mailing list (which is > > > > the most important record-keeping thing for Apache). > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:52 PM Jan Piotrowski <piotrow...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Wasn't `cordova-discuss` for a totally different use case? > > > > > > > > > > From how I understood it, Cordova has/had a formal "proposal" > process > > > > > that consisted of someone writing a proposal as a PR for higher > level > > > > > topics. Then a discussion was triggered via an email to this list, > > > > > which was had in the comments and reviews of the PR. Text was > adapted > > > > > and changed, later the proposal was voted on on the list again. If > it > > > > > was accepted, the proposal was merged into the repository and > progress > > > > > was kept track via changes to the document again. Correct? > > > > > > > > > > If this process should be abolished, fine. > > > > > If not, it should be documented so knowledge about it isn't just > > > anecdotal. > > > > > But moving it over to apache/cordova doesn't make sense. > > > > > > > > > > What organically happened in the issues of cordova-discuss - it > kind > > > > > of became a place for issues without a proposal as well - was just > > > > > because it was one of the only Cordova repositories with issues > > > > > enabled (as it used to live in the `cordova` organisation, not > > > > > "apache", on Github) before. > > > > > Now most of the issues there can just be moved to the correct > > > > > component repository. If an "overview" of those is needed, we got > the > > > > > GitHub Apache Cordova project board that could probably be used for > > > > > that (keep track of issues across multiple repositories and even > > > > > categorize them). > > > > > > > > > > If there are issues left after that, those could be placed into > > > > > `apache/cordova` as a "high level cordova discussion" area if we > > > > > define it that way. > > > > > > > > > > J > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 08:01 Uhr schrieb Shazron < > shaz...@gmail.com > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should stick to one repo -- > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova and archive the discuss repo. > > > > > > We should point to that one repo for all things Cordova w.r.t to > dev. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:13 AM Chris Brody < > chris.br...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While I personally think it would continue to fill an existing > gap > > > (track > > > > > > > discussion of some random and otherwise uncategorized Cordova > > > topics) it > > > > > > > has proven to be unpopular. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some alternatives I can think of: > > > > > > > * discuss such discussions in > https://github.com/apache/cordova > > > > > > > * discuss elsewhere such as cordova-coho or cordova-contribute > > > > > > > * consider using a solution such as Discourse > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am a bit concerned that discussions by email and in Slack are > > > easy to > > > > > > > forget and not easy to keep track of. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. As a side point I am not so happy to see most dev > discussions > > > on Slack > > > > > > > in private PMC channel. I would be much happier to see such > > > discussions in > > > > > > > a public channel such as "dev". > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > >
