erisu commented on a change in pull request #1: chore: added missing package repo & bug field URL: https://github.com/apache/cordova-eslint/pull/1#discussion_r342898975
########## File path: package.json ########## @@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ "scripts": { "test": "eslint ." }, + "repository": { + "type": "git", + "url": "https://github.com/apache/cordova-eslint" + }, Review comment: I decided to use `"repository": "github:apache/cordova-eslint",`. Even though `"repository": "apache/cordova-eslint",` looks cleaner, there are concerns on how NPM handle which source is displayed when there are multiple sources exist. * What if today GH is displayed first due to ordering but in the future they decided another service is displayed first. * What if there are multiple source, does npm display both? * If multiple sources exist and displayed, what if one is just a spoof repo that we dont have control? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org