Sure, ISARTOR (not far from where I'm sitting) is a set of PDFs that are not PDF/A-1b compliant. One uses them to make sure that one's PDF/A-1b tests correctly trap the errors. The files are about testing for non-conformance. They are a good first step! The other collection is just a set of 10 PDF/UA documents to show what good PDF/UA can look like. The reference suite says nothing really about conformance but is a nice "reference" for getting the UA ball rolling.... Both are quite useful but don't really....
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2015 16:36 An: [email protected] Betreff: RE: Apache™ PDFBox™ named an Open Source Partner Organization of the PDF Association : The Apache Software Foundation Blog Oh, sorry. I should not have said "conformance." What I was thinking of was <http://www.pdfa.org/2011/08/isartor-test-suite/> and <http://www.pdfa.org/publication/pdfua-reference-suite/>. I note that "conforming" is used with respect to the reference suite, but I don't think those are offered as any determination of compliance. I do favor what I see of the approach to test suites there. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Edward Zimmermann [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 02:47 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: AW: Apache™ PDFBox™ named an Open Source Partner Organization of the PDF Association : The Apache Software Foundation Blog Hi All, I'm not familiar with any conformance testing, much less strong, within the PDFA. The Association is mainly about PDF advocacy and as a networking umbrella for most of the world's PDF experts. As a Class-A liaison to ISO on PDF we've, for example, had via the Association early access to PDF 2.0 and were able to contribute our reviews. The Association also maintains a PDF/A competence center and provides expertise to a number of organizations. Conformance testing? Of What? [ ... ]
