On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Peter Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:

> > On 8 Apr 2015, at 8:58 pm, jan i <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
>
> >> I am flying to austin saturday, and will probably have my hands full
> next
> > week, due to my
> > travel assistance work.
>
> This is actually very good timing. If possible, I’ll try to get my commits
> in by the time the conference starts (or at the very least, least before it
> ends), so if you end up finding people interested in taking part in the
> project, the desktop app (which primarily requires UI design/implementation
> work) will be a good thing to promote, and a (relatively) straightforward
> thing to get involved with.
>
> I’m hoping in the near future to see lots of interesting discussions on
> the list about how the UI should look & work. We have a really unique
> opportunity here to take a “clean slate” approach to a word processing UI,
> though there’s a lot of existing ideas in the space to build on (and we
> shouldn’t ignore history). So this is an one aspect something that might be
> very attractive to some people, esp. those who are frustrated with the
> limitations and/or complexity of existing word processors.
>
> I will add a couple of slides about this, good idea.

rgds
jan i

> --
> Dr. Peter M. Kelly
> [email protected] <javascript:;>
> http://www.kellypmk.net/
>
> PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key>
> (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)
>
>

-- 
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.

Reply via email to