It may just be me, but I would not have looked in ooxml for docx documents, but expected to find them in a docx directory. In ooxml I would have expected (wrongly) xml documents.
With the symlink, it won't matter and it removes one small potential confusion. G On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Franz de Copenhague < [email protected]> wrote: > > > ---------------------------------------- > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:29:48 +0100 > > Subject: Re: ODF document example to apply Peter's style name approach > > To: [email protected] > > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Franz de Copenhague < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > > I have realized that there is a little inconsistency between the > standards > >> name OOXML and ODF and the folder example names. > >> > >> sample/documents/odf/DupStyleName.odt sounds good > >> sample/documents/docx/Whatever.docx could be like > >> sample/documents/ooxml/Whatever.docx > >> > >> Maybe we should add a symlink here for ooxml directory? > > > > G > > -- > > Visit my Coding Diary: http://gabriela-gibson.blogspot.com/ > > docx folder doesn't contain any document. So, we can rename it if people > prefer ooxml folder name. > > franz -- Visit my Coding Diary: http://gabriela-gibson.blogspot.com/
