On Monday, May 4, 2015, Gabriela Gibson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Franz de Copenhague < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 07:59:31 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: Operations.c: DFGet() called from > consumers/dfconvert/main.c > > > From: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > > > On Monday, May 4, 2015, Gabriela Gibson <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> I also would like to rename int r = 0; to the (a little more obvious) > > int > > >> success = 0; > > >> > > >> What do you think? > > > > > > sounds logical to me. > > > > To keep the semantics you can do r = SUCCESS instead of r = 0; and define > > SUCCESS somewhere > > > > That would be a global decision --- and I think quite a good one, since > this kind of pattern will come up a number of times in the code and it's > nice to have uniformity. > > I'm not sure in which header file this would live in, so that it can be > found everywhere. > > What does everyone think about this? platform.h comes into mind, since theoretically a new platform might redefine it. just a suggestion, no strong opinion. rgds jan i > > G > > > > > > > -- > Visit my Coding Diary: http://gabriela-gibson.blogspot.com/ > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
