The ODF schema is taken from here: http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-schema.rng
(linked to from https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office#technical under the title "Open Document Format v1.2, Relax NG Schema”) I did a compare using diff to verify they’re the same - they show up as difference but it’s whitespace only (diff -w shows no differences). There’s a license on page 4 of http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/OpenDocument-v1.2-part1.pdf, which I would assume applies to the .rng file. The OOXML RelaxNG files are, I believe, originally retrieved from here: http://www.ecma-international.org/news/TC45_current_work/TC45_available_docs.htm However the files in the repository are in the XML-based dialect of RelaxNG, not the compact syntax used above. I converted the original files to the XML-based format using trang (http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang.html) so I could more easily process them. — Dr Peter M. Kelly [email protected] PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key> (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966) > On 14 Aug 2015, at 2:52 am, Peter Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > > I get the following error when running CMake: > > CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:64 (add_subdirectory): > add_subdirectory given source "consumers/dfutil/src" which is not an > existing directory. > > > CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:69 (add_subdirectory): > add_subdirectory given source "experiments/flat/src" which is not an > existing directory. > > The two lines referencing these directories should be removed from > CMakeLists.txt > > I’m also wondering about the licensing situation regarding the ODF and OOXML > schema files in the schemas directory. I can’t remember off hand where these > originally came from, but I’m pretty sure they were from the official > websites of the respective specifications, as an appendix/attachment. They > are not needed for building the code, and don’t need to be included as part > of the distribution (though I see no harm in doing so if there are no > licensing problems). > > — > Dr Peter M. Kelly > [email protected] > > PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key> > (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966) > >> On 14 Aug 2015, at 2:29 am, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> We are now so close, that I have made a release candidate. >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip >> >> and the signature: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip.asc >> >> If Justin has more changes, I will update these 2 files, otherwise please >> try them out and make comments before we start the actual vote. >> >> I recommend, we concentrate on the technical issues and leave the >> LICENSE/NOTICE issues to the IPMC (which is why Justin has been checking >> the source zip a number of times). >> >> When we start the vote, intention is to let it run for 7 calendar days. A >> release vote cannot be vetoed, but need at least 3 PPMC +1, and of course >> any -1 should be discussed. >> >> rgds >> jan i >
