> On 15 Aug 2015, at 12:45 am, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 14 August 2015 at 19:35, Peter Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On 15 Aug 2015, at 12:23 am, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> We could name the release candidates .rcx some projects to do that. But >> I >>> personally do not like that we vote about foo.r5.zip but upload foo.zip >> to >>> the release >>> server. I want to vote on the exact image that will be uploaded to dist. >> >> Actually I think having .rcx would be good, because then we can easily >> distinguish between the different versions, and when the official [VOTE] >> begins it can be “Vote if you agree that foo-0.1.rc5.zip (with signature >> 0xABCDEF) should become the official 0.1 release”. Then there’s no >> ambiguity as to which actual file we’re voting on. >> > ?? there is not any doubt, the file we VOTE on (when that time comes) is > the one uploaded to dist/dev/incubator... that file cannot change during a > VOTE, if it does it is > a new VOTE.
Ok that makes sense; as long as the file does not change after the VOTE has begun that’s fine. I think what confused me was that you talked about the file being uploaded to dist, when it’s already there. — Dr Peter M. Kelly [email protected] PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key> (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)
