Abstentions are not to be discussed. Abstentions are abstentions. And why discuss them in private? The [VOTE] was done here. There is no private@ business called for. The only ballot that requires an explanation is a -1.
Furthermore, I take personal exception to my abstention in the [PRE-VOTE] being carried forward, effectively, against my wishes, and reported anyhow when it is not applicable to this [VOTE]. That is unacceptable. Please do not do that again. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2015 01:10 To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1 Hi I am pleased to announce that we can continue with our release. It has been a long journey so far and the next step is to have IPMC vote for the release. The vote passed with: 8 +1 (include 1 Mentor vote) 0 +0 (Dennis gave this in the PRE-VOTE, but wrote "I do not give permission for this to be applied automatically to a genuine [VOTE]" so it is not counted. 0 -1 4 PPMC abstained from voting (will be discussed later on private). Daniel Gruno and Myself have binding IPMC votes, which I will transfer. rgds jan i. On 20 August 2015 at 21:27, Dorte Fjalland <dortecasacon...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Regards > Dorte > El 20/8/2015 17:15, "Louis Suárez-Potts" <lui...@gmail.com> escribió: > > > +1 > > louis > > > > PS thanks for the reminder. > > > > > > > On 18 Aug 15, at 14:06, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > We have found some errors during the PRE-VOTE phase, which made that > > period > > > very > > > valuable instead of jumping direct to a VOTE. > > > > > > This is the call for the official VOTE for > > incubator_corinthia_release_0.1 > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip > > > > > > and the signature: > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip.asc > > > > > > The vote we will follow the standard guidelines: > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority > approval > > > <http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval> -- > > i.e., > > > at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and > there > > > must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be vetoed." > > > > > > VOTE runs until Monday 23th August, where the IPMC VOTE will start. > > > > > > I invite our mentors to vote, since their vote count as IPMC. > > > > > > All IPMC who vote, please write if you do NOT want your vote to be > > > transferred to the IPMC vote. > > > > > > rgds > > > jan i > > > > > > Vote: > > > [ ] +1, I agree in releasing the artifacts > > > [ ] +0, I do not care if we release the artifacts > > > [ ] -1, I do not want the artifacts to be release because .... > > > > >
