On Thursday, August 27, 2015, Ian C <i...@amham.net> wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:27 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 26, 2015, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> How were the contributions made? If via JIRA, mailing list or Wiki then > >> these are understood to be ok. > > > > I think you missed my point. Contribution was to this ML by a committer > so > > no problem. > > (it was michael, who is AOO committer and helping build there). > > > > But what fun do we have to add a platform, if we do not have a > > personwilling to maintain it. I do not like to have platforms that appear > > on our wiki but are in reality not maintained. > > I build of Fedora too.
thanks, then I will add it. Is fedora the same as centOS t, I remember a discussion in AOO, where I think andrea explained the connection but I cannot find it. Reason being that we have centOS buildbot but not fedora. rgds jan i > > > > > rgds > > jan i > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> Dave > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> > On Aug 26, 2015, at 9:57 AM, jan i <j...@apache.org <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi. > >> > > >> > I am rewriting the build instructions (again), after input from 2 IPMC > >> that > >> > tested our release. > >> > > >> > While doing the rewrite, I remember that we got the instructions for > >> > Fedora, due to > >> > a contributor. > >> > > >> > How do we handle such contributions, I would like to add them to the > >> > instructions, > >> > with a clear note that it is (currently) an unsupported platform. > >> > > >> > Thoughts ? > >> > > >> > rgds > >> > jan i. > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings. > > > > -- > Cheers, > > Ian C > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
