Hi,
On 9 Feb 2009, at 16:15, Zachary Zolton wrote:
My mistake; I'm not used to how this group works yet. Thanks for
setting me straight!
np :)
Frankly, I'm just excited to be able to contribute to this project.
Looking for more low-hanging fruit on which to practice my Erlang...
https://issues.apache.org:443/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310780&priority=1&status=1&status=3&status=4&fixfor=12313208&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC
Thanks for your help!
Cheers
Jan
--
PS: thanks Paul for pre-validating it.
Cheers,
Zach
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Paul Davis <[email protected]
> wrote:
The patch looks solid assuming that using a date from 1900 is kosher.
Getting it accepted means waiting for one of the devs to go on a
close
out spree. Its on the blocking list so don't worry about it missing
0.9
HTH,
Paul Davis
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Zachary Zolton <[email protected]
> wrote:
All,
I posted a patch for this last week, including the modifications
suggested by the mailing list, but haven't heard any activity.
Is there anything else I should do to get this patch accepted?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-190
Cheers,
Zach
