On Feb 9, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
Assuming the replication processes doesn't interleave documents from
different MVCC commits,
I believe that's correct.
I think it's only correct if you don't edit the doc after the
_bulk_docs call. Making two calls to _bulk_docs and then editing a
document from the first transaction would make things interleave I
think.
It sounds like we're on the same page, Paul. If you define a commit
as a list of id/rev pairs there's no interleaving. Call the doc that
was edited twice A/"foo" and A/"bar". A/"foo" is part of the first
_bulk_docs, and it disappears from the replication stream once A/"bar"
lands.
Adam
