>> If you mean in trunk, I'm not sure but I doubt it. If for no other >> reason than if we added such a feature to trunk it'd be a signal that >> we intend to support it for a very long time when we're already acting >> on plans to replace it. >> >>> If not, we'll just keep using the patch internally (and offer it >>> out-of-tree) while waiting for the superseding functionality. > > I'd keep using you patch until the new API lands. The new way will be > more robust and far more flexible. The old way will stay around for a > while, but will likely be removed before 1.0.
Thanks. That makes it very clear. --gera.
