On Jun 29, 2009, at 8:34 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hey,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:34:53PM -0400, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
I don't know if it's a regression. My logic was that we don't want
to do
a release that fails our own test suite. I think it will be less work
down the line if we just fix it tonight. Cheers,
Okay, I am closing the vote as a failure.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:59:47PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
As for the mechanics of doing a vote, I'd just wait for those that
expressed concern about the test case failing to verify that a new
0.9.1 tarball doesn't fail and if so then move on with our lives.
Sorry, it doesn't work like that!
Let me know when the tests are passing, and I'll cut another release.
Hi Noah, I think the 0.9.x branch should be ready for another attempt
at a release. Best,
Adam
