On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Rickard Cardell<kptz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again > > So if I understand it right, by using this view server, it is possible to > totally avoid the javascripting? There seems to be a lot of overhead when > using javascript, e.g converting erlang terms to json, message passing and > so forth >
Yep. This avoids JSON serialization as well as stdio transfers. >> And its Erlang in case you prefer that flavor. > > It sure is my flavor though i'm a beginner :) > >> Link is: http://github.com/davisp/couchdb/tree/native_proc/ >> >> Sorry for forgetting that. > > np, I found it and it looks neat. Haven't had time to try it out yet though > > > //Rickard > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Davis" > <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> > To: <dev@couchdb.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 6:45 PM > Subject: Re: Native Erlang view server > > > Rickard, > > The biggest improvement is speed. The native view server able to sneak > all the way into the same OS process as the HTTP request so that there > isn't even message passing overhead (except for lists). > > And its Erlang in case you prefer that flavor. > > Link is: http://github.com/davisp/couchdb/tree/native_proc/ > > Sorry for forgetting that. > > Paul > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Rickard Cardell<kptz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> >> 2009/7/28 Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> >> >> Hey, >> >> I zoned out a bit and finished getting the native Erlang view server >> passing all of the rspec tests. The code can be found online at [1] >> and I'll also attach a patch. >> >> I can't see [1] :) >> >> >> >> >> If anyone wants to play with it, that'd be pretty cool. There's >> probably a bit of weakness in error reporting right now, but I think >> it should work other than that. >> >> >> Sounds interesting. What are the benefits of using the erlang view server >> compared to the native javascript dito? >> >> Does it still use javascript at the bottom? >> >> //Rickard >> >> >> Paul >> > >
