On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Volker Mische <volker.mis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Chris Anderson wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Scott Shumaker <sshuma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is there a replacement for all_docs_by_seq? >>> >> >> all_docs_by_seq will be in 0.10, but deprecated. >> >> most of it's functionality is available on the 0.10 _changes feed but >> all of it's functionality will be moved to _changes for 0.11 > > Would it be a problem to the the full _all_docs_by_seq replacement into > 0.10. I find it a bit unfortunate that a feature gets removed in the > next release without having one release where the deprecated and its > replacement coexist side by side. > > I know the background of the removal so I'm happy for it in this case, > but I think in future releases there should be a longer phase for > deprecation. > > Cheers, > Volker >
Volker, _changes with deletions is in 0.10.x which makes it the version that they exist side by side. The removal of _all_docs_by_seq hasn't been backported specifically for this reason. Paul
