On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Curt Arnold <carn...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Sep 28, 2009, at 8:16 PM, Paul Joseph Davis wrote: > >> That is quite doable. I reckon I have an eta of 20-25 minutes before i'm >> back to !iPhone. Though me or someone else should double check what ended up >> being required for the oauth and ibrowse imports. >> >> If it requires faxing I'm only comitting the check. I think that it didn't >> but we need to make certain. There was a big thread on it. The only keywords >> comming to mind are uncertain, uneasy, or similar. First email was from Curt >> Arnold I do believe. >> >> Yay release! >> >> > > I took a quick peek at the Github for ETAP. A quick peek did not reveal > what license ETAP uses. Did I miss it? One of the big qualifiers in the > quoted email was a 3rd party dependency with an ASF compatible license. > > The "unease" thread was related to using GitHub for collaborative > development where the mailing list community is unaware of a big development > effort until it hits the SVN in an already gelled state and can no long > influence the design. Doesn't really bear on pulling something from GitHub. >
Yeah, I got my threads mixed up. I meant the one entitled "Dependencies in SVN".
