Ahem, roadmap people? Come on, pull your socks up. We need to pick the ball up 
here.

On 14 Dec 2009, at 01:53, Jan Lehnardt wrote:

> Great feedback. Moving to dev@
> 
> Thanks Roger.
> 
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
> 
> On 13 Dec 2009, at 13:57, Roger Binns wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>> The worst that could happen is that
>>> people stop asking questions and I certainly don't want that.
>> 
>> That is likely to happen with crossposting too because people are less
>> likely to answer and they certainly won't go an answer in all locations so
>> some of them won't have answers.
> 
> I think I'm willing to take that risk :)
> 
> 
>> Anyone searching those locations first
>> will then see a lack of answers and assume that CouchDB is dead or stagnant.
> 
> If people are really interested in CouchDB, they quickly discover the
> active community. If they stop looking after one empty question, I don't
> think they really care :)
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>> The underlying problem is probably that the mailing list archives lack
>>> any sort of features that people find useful on StackOverflow. Maybe
>>> there's an angle to solve this in a nice way.
>> 
>> How about fixing the home page to have a link about getting help in the "Get
>> Involved" section.  (Currently you are encouraged to come up with patches
>> which is a little too much at the beginning!)
>> 
>> I've created a wiki page with what I think should be pointed to:
>> 
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Getting%20Help
>> 
>> I think it would be best if a Google Custom Search was created which
>> automatically included the relevant locations (mailing list archive, wiki,
>> bug tracker) and hosted on the front page of couchdb.org.
>> 
>> http://www.google.com/cse/
>> 
>> BTW it is probably also worthwhile making the front page of couchdb.org
>> indicate that the project is actually alive.  There is no date on the page,
>> there is no "news" feed or even a link to news and pages like the roadmap
>> have no dates and are out of date anyway.
>> 
>> Roger
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>> 
>> iEYEARECAAYFAkslY0EACgkQmOOfHg372QQuLwCgoEfC6hDDDWVDD8ztrEDkhtl3
>> WVsAoOATGBKZpUnhR+sIJEQ/3MMk1uKk
>> =mxFM
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
> 

Reply via email to