On Feb 27, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:22 AM, J Chris Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:00 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote: >> >>> I would still like to see ticket 639 in 0.11. >>> >> >> I'm reading 639 and it seems like a great patch. But it's a little bit big >> and I can't tell for certain that there isn't something subtle I'm not >> seeing. I think the best course of action would be to apply it just after >> the 0.11 release, so it gets some field testing before it goes out in a >> release. >> >> It's not a new feature so it is still a candidate for 0.11.1 / 1.0. I'd >> just feel better about introducing a large patch to the code base if it has >> time to get used in a few different settings before being baked into a >> release. >> > > True, it's a little bit big. > In that case I don't mind having it in a 0.11.1 release. > > cheers
Sorry, I didn't get around to reviewing 639 till today, but it's in trunk now. Cheers, Adam
