On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 29 Apr 2010, at 13:52, Robert Dionne wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Benoit Chesneau
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Currently I only see bugs to fix that not so sexy. Also I think we
>>>> really should have goals on which to code.
>>>>
>>>> - Benoit
>>>>
>>>
>>> I fully agree on that.
>
> Cool, we all agree. What should we put on there?
Any number of things that have been discussed here in the past[1, 2], server
side plugins, otp-ification (is that a word?), native FTI, webmachine support,
really anything is fine. What's important for me anyway is to know where
couchdb is headed. The neat thing about couchdb is the code base is small
enough to get your arms around it and work with it, but it is growing, and just
a little harder to embrace than it used to be.
Best,
Bob
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06174.html
[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06379.html
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
