On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 13:17, Jan Lehnardt <j...@couchone.com> wrote: > Now my question is if that's a good enough way to version > things. How e.g. would upgrades to the CouchDBX shell be > denoted? > > Is the extra number confusing? Is any other scheme confusing? > Is the matching CouchDB release numbers important enough to > keep?
The extra number seems in line with what other places do, so it seems alright. I suspect you would handle upgrades to the CouchDBX shell, the same way, e.g. by increasing the extra version identifier. FWIW Gentoo uses -r1 instead of -1 which I like a tiny little bit better, but it's basically a wash. Cheers, Dirkjan
