On 28 Nov 2010, at 20:58, Robert Newson wrote: > I don't think we should make a release when we have a known and serious bug.
I agree. Cheers Jan -- > > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl> wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 13:55, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> Should we hold 1.0.2 for this? >>> >>> If releases are a whole bunch of work, then yes. >>> >>> However, since this doesn't seem to be a (recent) regression, it would >>> IMHO be even greater if we had this 1.0.2 and a quick 1.0.3 once this >>> thing is fixed. >>> >> >> There was a separate issue in the CHANGES and NEWS that were enough to >> veto the 1.0.2 artefacts. I'd vote to just wait for this to get sussed >> out before moving forward with 1.0.2 again. >> >> Paul >> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dirkjan >>> >>
