On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:09 AM, till <t...@php.net> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that >>>> COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. >>>> Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm >>>> inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998 >>>> >>> >>> Just curious -- why is the patch attached not applied? >>> >>> Till >>> >> >> I reckon it's because no one that knows JavaScript has reviewed it to >> decide if it should be applied. >> > > I answered to the ticket. If I read correctly the futon code, the > patch is OK. Can't commit from this machine so I will let you do the > final step :) > > - benoit >
Thanks, Benoit! Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x feature? Till
