On 1/20/11 10:45 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Volker Mische<volker.mis...@gmail.com> wrote:
{
"from": "/page/:x/:y/:z",
"to": "/_show/post/:x-:y-:z/something",
"params": {
"x": {
"match": "\\d",
},
"y": {
"match": "\\d",
},
"z": {
"match": "\\d",
}
}
This one is already possible in current couchapp_legacy rewriter. I'm
not a fan to have something other than :
patterns: {
"name1": "regexp",
...
}
It will make the system really complex. Maybe as an option though. I
can detect if I have an object or not. I think it would be better to
say ".*"
(and i need to find a new name for couchapp_legacy)
- benoît
I couldn't speak to the complexity of the code as I'm fairly new to
Erlang. In any case, I think we need to keep the URL's in "from" and
"to" easy to read and provide flexible parsing options with a "standard"
(or standard set) available by default.
If we support regular expressions, I'd suggest using PCRE over any other
as its widely known and used (Django, nginx, PHP, mod_rewrite).
