On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:02 PM, Chris Stockton wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Filipe David Manana > <fdman...@apache.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Chris Stockton >> <chrisstockto...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Chris, >> >> That said work is in the'1.2.x' branch (and master). >> CouchDB recently migrated from SVN to GIT, see: >> http://couchdb.apache.org/community/code.html >> > > Thank you very much for the response Filipe, do you possibly have any > documentation or more detailed summary on what these changes include > and possible benefits of them? I would love to hear about any tweaking > or replication tips you may have for our growth issues, perhaps you > could answer a basic question if nothing else: Do the changes in this > branch minimize the performance impact of continuous replication on > many databases? > > Regardless I plan on getting a build of that branch and doing some > testing of my own very soon. > > Thank you! > > -Chris
I'm pretty sure that even in 1.2.x and master each replication with a remote source still requires one dedicated TCP connection to consume the _changes feed. Replications with a local source have always been able to use a connection pool per host:port combination. That's not to downplay the significance of the rewrite of the replicator in 1.2.x; Filipe put quite a lot of time into it. The link to "those darn errors" just pointed to the mbox browser for September 2011. Do you have a more specific link? Regards, Adam
