[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158238#comment-13158238
 ] 

Randall Leeds commented on COUCHDB-431:
---------------------------------------

CORS by default is too scary with local DBs. I think it breaks common 
assumptions about the web. I don't want to have to create admin accounts on my 
local, 127.0.0.1 couch in order to prevent a malicious site from stealing my 
personal data.

As for credentials for all origins, I'm saying that the spec asks browsers not 
to allow it, therefore whatever config system we have need not allow that to be 
configured.
For example, Jason suggested something like:
[cors]
hostA = http://originX https://originY
hostB = *

Where default would be to allow credentials for originX and originY, but not 
for any other. Without specifying credentials in the ini file, the default is 
to do what the spec says are the use cases.

I still think we can do better for configuration, though.
                
> Support cross domain XMLHttpRequest (XHR) calls by implementing Access 
> Control spec
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-431
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-431
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>    Affects Versions: 0.9
>            Reporter: James Burke
>            Assignee: Benoit Chesneau
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>         Attachments: 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431-2.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> A_0001-Generalize-computing-the-appropriate-headers-for-any.patch, 
> A_0002-Send-server-headers-for-externals-responses.patch, 
> A_0003-Usably-correct-w3c-CORS-headers-for-valid-requests.patch, 
> A_0004-Respond-to-CORS-preflight-checks-HTTP-OPTIONS.patch, cors.html, 
> cors_test.html, test_cors2-1.tgz, test_cors2.tgz
>
>
> Historically, browsers have been restricted to making XMLHttpRequests (XHRs) 
> to the same origin (domain) as the web page making the request. However, the 
> latest browsers now support cross-domain requests by implementing the Access 
> Control spec from the W3C:
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/
> In order to keep older servers safe that assume browsers only do same-domain 
> requests, the Access Control spec requires the server to opt-in to allow 
> cross domain requests by the use of special HTTP headers and supporting some 
> "pre-flight" HTTP calls.
> Why should CouchDB support this: in larger, high traffic site, it is common 
> to serve the static UI files from a separate, differently scaled server 
> complex than the data access/API server layer. Also, there are some API 
> services that are meant to be centrally hosted, but allow API consumers to 
> use the API from different domains. In these cases, the UI in the browser 
> would need to do cross domain requests to access CouchDB servers that act as 
> the API/data access server layer.
> JSONP is not enough in these cases since it is limited to GET requests, so no 
> POSTing or PUTing of documents.
> Some information from Firefox's perspective (functionality available as of 
> Firefox 3.5):
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/HTTP_access_control
> And information on Safari/Webkit (functionality in latest WebKit and Safari 
> 4):
> http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/AppleApplications/Conceptual/SafariJSProgTopics/Articles/XHR.html
> IE 8 also uses the Access Control spec, but the requests have to go through 
> their XDomainRequest object (XDR):
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288060%28VS.85%29.aspx
> and I thought IE8 only allowed GET or POST requests through their XDR.
> But as far as CouchDB is concerned, implementing the Access Control headers 
> should be enough, and hopefully IE 9 will allow normal xdomain requests via 
> XHR.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to