I'd like to merge the persistent cookies feature (COUCHDB-1304) into 1.2.x if it's not too late.
B. On 16 January 2012 11:26, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: > I merged master so I can't be positive which commit is the fix yet but > this one looks likely: > https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/commit/e05aa73f1acbfe877f7f0b6214f572b5a42b3db8 > > B. > > On 16 January 2012 01:09, Filipe David Manana <fdman...@apache.org> wrote: >> On Sunday, January 15, 2012, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: >>> I'd say it's too late for the ibrowse fix but we should pick it up for 1.3 >> >> Can you point us to what that ibrowse fix is (e.g. Github commit link)? >> As far as I can see there are no fixes upstream that we don't have in 1.2.x >> Thanks >> >>> >>> B. >>> >>> On 15 January 2012 21:31, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote: >>>> I await your feedback. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If it's a regression, before. If not, after. >>>>> >>>>> B. >>>>> >>>>> On 15 January 2012 19:40, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote: >>>>> > Are we going to punt on a Windows binary, Dave? >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <d...@muse.net.nz> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> On 15 January 2012 19:05, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote: >>>>> >> > Bump. Dave? Gonna move without if you don't speak up. :) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Sorry!! Literally *just* finished looking at this. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> TL;DR - let's roll 1.2.0. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I don't see any *functional* issues in the failures from the test >>>>> >> suite - attachments are written, and read, correctly. For some as yet >>>>> >> unknown reason the MD5 is different on Windows vs Linux & Mac OS, but >>>>> >> this has been present for some time. It's only turned up as a result >>>>> >> of additional tests applied in COUCHDB-1337. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> The underlying crypto:md5 values are the same, and so is the raw HTTP >>>>> >> data. I am still digging through mochi to where this comes from. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I don't see any issues for replication - can anybody confirm? This >>>>> >> looks like a dev issue rather than user impacting. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> from 1.1.1_js-1.8.0: >>>>> >> 12> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary). >>>>> >> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> from 1.2.x: >>>>> >> 8> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary). >>>>> >> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> A+ >>>>> >> Dave >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Filipe David Manana, >> >> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. >> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. >> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
