On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> I've produced a new script that reproduces the view regression. I >>>> apologize in advance for exposing my awful Bash scripting abilities >>>> (also my inability to write "pure" shell. Your "Bashism" is my "it >>>> works"). >>>> >>>> I get 0m56.521s for 1.1.x and 1m17.108s for 1.2.x. That is, 1.1.x >>>> complete the same task in only 72% of the time that 1.2.x takes. >>>> >>>> http://friendpaste.com/UI1OcECLEzR6i4D75LqQy >>>> >>> >>> hrm with the same script: >>> >>> 1.2.0 : >>> real 0m23.842s >>> user 0m0.007s >>> sys 0m0.004s >>> >>> 1.1.1: >>> real 0m28.625s >>> user 0m0.008s >>> sys 0m0.005s >>> >>> hw specs : >>> $ uname -a >>> Darwin enki.local 11.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.3.0: Thu Jan 12 >>> 18:47:41 PST 2012; root:xnu-1699.24.23~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 >>> mba 2011: i7 4 GB SSD 256 GB >>> >>> >>> - benoît >> >> Just for my curiosity I tested it in the couchdb based distribution I >> maintain (head, last mochiweb + jiffy) : >> >> >> real 0m19.539s >> user 0m0.007s >> sys 0m0.005s >> done > > I launched the tests a second time and same results: > > 1.1.1 : > real 0m29.155s > user 0m0.009s > sys 0m0.006s > > 1.2.0 : > > real 0m25.466s > user 0m0.008s > sys 0m0.005s
tested with 100000 docs : 1.1.1: real 1m2.352s user 0m0.007s sys 0m0.013s 1.2.0: real 0m52.005s user 0m0.009s sys 0m0.008s All previous tests were with 1.8.5 . With 1.7.0 on 50000 docs: 1.1.1: real 2m3.828s user 0m0.009s sys 0m0.011s 1.2.0: real 2m49.243s user 0m0.009s sys 0m0.011s - benoît
