On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: > Can you tell us how you installed 1.2.x? Is it a fresh installation, > did you do an in-place update from an earlier installation (earlier > 1.2.x or 1.1.x or 1.0.x?
I first did a fresh install of 1.2.x using R15B. I then removed R15B, installed R14B04 (both from source), compiled 1.2.x with the patch I mentioned earlier, and did an in-place update. If this is a problem, I could remove CouchDB first and do a fresh install instead. What would be the preferred way to do a clean uninstall? -- Stefan > On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:17 , Stefan Kögl wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> My experiments to replicate some live data / traffic to a CouchDB >> 1.2.x (running the current 1.2.x branch + the patch from [1]) that >> sparked the indexing speed discussions, did also yield another >> (potential) problem. First sorry for not further reporting back any >> performance measurements, but I didn't yet find the time to run the >> tests on my machines. >> >> Anyway, I found the following stack traces in my log (after noticing >> that some requests failed and compaction of a view stopped) >> >> http://skoegl.net/~stefan/tmp/couchdb-1.2.x-crash.txt >> >> The files starts at the first failed requests. Every request before >> that returned a positiv (ie 2xx) status code. The crash might have >> some "natural" reason (such as timeouts, lack of RAM, etc), but I'm >> not sure how to interpret Erlang stack traces. Can somebody point me >> in the right direction for diagnosing the problem? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Stefan >> >> >> [1] http://friendpaste.com/178nPFgfyyeGf2vtNRpL0w >
