Cool. Please let us know how you get on. Getting packages in either would be a huge bonus for the project. Maybe the maintainer would be open to co-maintainership?
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Wendall Cada <wenda...@83864.com> wrote: > I'll ping the maintainer with the revisions I've made. There has been very > little progress for quite some time from this maintainer, so I'm > withholding expectations. For now, just giving people the ability to > install from a compatible package is a start. I don't have any established > relationships with the couchdb maintainer. > > Wendall > > > On 03/09/2012 04:12 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > >> This is great! And way to get them in Fedora or CentOS? >> >> >> >> On 8 Mar 2012, at 17:24, Wendall Cada<wenda...@83864.com> wrote: >> >> I've created a working spec file and patches that match what's available >>> in Fedora (couchdb-1.0.3) and Centos (couchdb-1.0.2), but for 1.2.0-git. >>> I've added a patch for COUCHDB-1424 provided by Filipe. I'll pull this >>> patch out once 1.2.0 is ready for a vote again and other changes have been >>> pushed. >>> >>> Instructions and source files can be found here: >>> https://github.com/wendall911/**couchdb-rpm<https://github.com/wendall911/couchdb-rpm> >>> >>> If you have any questions, hit me up in irc, my nick is wendall911 >>> >>> Wendall >>> >> >
