On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 06:29, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > In these recent cases all I see is that a few minutes of discussion > would have saved a lot of noise. We should be collaborating closely at > the tail end of a release. > > In general, though, I thought we already were review before commit, > which is why patches go to JIRA or we make branches in git. It's just > me that thinks this?
Sorry to get ruffled just a moment ago. If there's a time for me to be committing to release branches without review, it's not 5:30am. My apologies. I appreciate Noah's response about good faith, though. I contemplated IRC, but decided it would be too involving and then decided that just e-mailing saying "you all deal with it" or sleeping felt wrong, too. I suppose I can't hope to be both helpful and simultaneously not fully engrossed. Let's have a real discussion about commit policy really soon.
