Yep, there is a private list. We use it for things which must remain confidential. The primary purpose is electing new committers, etc. I am sure you understand why personnel matters should be kept private.
I would also ask that you presume good faith. A simple note asking for clarification on the matter, or a quick search through the Apache site[1] would have been a much better response. [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#private-or-public On 19 March 2013 17:43, matt j. sorenson <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been trying really hard to refrain from comments that may be anything > less than constructive, I really have, but... > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Okay one more update. >> >> There has been some discussion about this thread on the private@ list. >> > > there's a private@ list?! I would have rather just gone on not knowing > that. so much for open, observable work -- the point of forcing everything > through the other list, or so I've been told. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v2ZBqjZyjA > > -- NS
