Hi Benoit, r16 has a fix for the TZ issue anyway, and I suspect mochiweb already has something there. If it doesn't I'll send that upstream.
On 2 April 2013 11:41, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > not totally related but why not sending the TZ patch upstream btw? Is > there anything against that? > > I'm worried we have to maintain our own versions for dependencies for > a long time instead of pushing upstream our changes I reckon that for > a limited time we have to maintain our own set of patches (upstream > integration can be slower or don't want the patch as is - which may be > a big warning for us -) but in that cad I suggest that we also put the > patch as a diff in our own repo under a `patches/` folder so it can be > integrated differently by vendors/distributors and in that case e > those who are using a separate mochiweb install. Also it would help us > to synchronize our changes with upstream. > > - benoît > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Klaus Trainer <klaus_trai...@posteo.de> > wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 23:26 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > >> If you run those by hand with an extra `-v` option, can you share the > logs > >> somewhere? > > > > Here you are: https://www.friendpaste.com/19YnF5A2nZHea25LEShpAi > > > >> > >> > >> On 1 April 2013 00:33, Klaus Trainer <klaus_trai...@posteo.de> wrote: > >> > >> > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 22:46 +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> > > On Mar 31, 2013, at 22:43 , Klaus Trainer <klaus_trai...@posteo.de> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Dave, what tests do you have exactly failing? > >> > > > > >> > > > I got nine (consistently) failing tests. However, it might be > possible > >> > > > that a few of them are timeout related, as I'm still working with > >> > > > spinning discs (do you remember those?) on my computer here. > That's why > >> > > > I'd like to compare. > >> > > > >> > > Can you post your list? :) > >> > > >> > Sure, why not :) > >> > > >> > not ok 27 form_submit > >> > not ok 36 oauth > >> > not ok 39 purge > >> > not ok 46 replication > >> > not ok 47 replicator_db > >> > not ok 49 rev_stemming > >> > not ok 51 security_validation > >> > not ok 62 view_conflicts > >> > not ok 64 view_include_docs > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > K > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 15:29 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > >> > > >> Hi everybody, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> I have a couple more tests to make on ensuring the timezone bug > in > >> > > >> earlier OTP releases is correctly resolved, but the bulk of the > work > >> > > >> is done. Unless somebody reports an issue, I'll include this > branch in > >> > > >> master in the next week, probably cherry-picked. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> [jira]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1696 > >> > > >> [branch]: > >> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2;hb=1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2 > >> > > >> > >> > > >> A+ > >> > > >> Dave > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >
