I'm fine with tagging my commits.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Simon Metson <si...@cloudant.com> wrote: > > > Seems awfully complicated to make fauxton erlang shaped when we > > > already have the simple static file handler. > > > > depends if fauxton eed more in the future. but for now I agree. Not sure > > though how the final build could be done for the release? sub-modules? or > > just a curl fetch and that's all? > > > Assuming eed == need - I can't see how it would need more, it's a consumer > of the API not an API itself. If there was something it needed it would be > built in the appropriate piece of CouchDB and Fauxton would reflect the new > API's. > > So, the question remains; what needs to be done to move fauxton to the new > repo? IIUC these new repos aren't ready for consumption, yet. Is that right? >
