[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13894701#comment-13894701
 ] 

Jens Alfke commented on COUCHDB-2052:
-------------------------------------

Benoit:
>"I am thinking that the faster answer to your problem would be listing all the 
>URI we have on a node associated to the vendor id and version."

This is not just about knowing what URIs are supported. See my previous post 
for three issues that can't be resolved this way.

> Add API for discovering feature availability
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-2052
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2052
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>            Reporter: Jens Alfke
>
> I propose adding to the response of "GET /" a property called "features" or 
> "extensions" whose value is an array of strings, each string being an 
> agreed-upon identifier of a specific optional feature. For example:
>       {"couchdb": "welcome", "features": ["_bulk_get", "persona"]}, "vendor": 
> …
> Rationale:
> Features are being added to CouchDB over time, plug-ins may add features, and 
> there are compatible servers that may have nonstandard features (like 
> _bulk_get). But there isn't a clear way for a client (which might be another 
> server's replicator) to determine what features a server has. Currently a 
> client looking at the response of a GET / has to figure out what server and 
> version thereof it's talking to, and then has to consult hardcoded knowledge 
> that version X of server Y supports feature Z.
> (True, you can often get away without needing to check, by assuming a feature 
> exists but falling back to standard behavior if you get an error. But not all 
> features may be so easy to detect — the behavior of an unaware server might 
> be to ignore the feature and do the wrong thing, rather than returning an 
> error — and anyway this adds extra round-trips that slow down the operation.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to