On 7 March 2014 23:44, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Nick North <nort...@gmail.com> wrote: > > When Dave has time to post more detailed findings someone may look at > them > > and spot the problem quickly. Otherwise I'm not sure of the best way > > forward: the community could take as long as it takes to get to the > bottom > > of the problem, or we could say that the issue probably relates only to > > tests, remove the ones that break and put out a release while working on > a > > solution in the background. Neither option is great. > > Yeah, it's tricky. > > I'm going to be out of the country for a week or so, so I'll be less > responsive. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan >
I have tested the 1.6.x branch at commit ce3e89dc9fef on my MBP: All tests successful. Files=51, Tests=1214, 254 wallclock secs ( 0.55 usr 0.11 sys + 84.92 cusr 19.49 csys = 105.07 CPU) Result: PASS Yay :) Erlang R16B03-1 (erts-5.10.4) I am +1 for starting a vote on 1.6-rc2 Cheers Andy -- Andy Wenk Hamburg - Germany RockIt! GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
